|22-04-2005, 03:39 PM||#1|
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Blog Entries: 42
[news] Intel knew DDR2 was poor design @ CoolTechZone.com
|24-04-2005, 05:02 PM||#2|
Join Date: Aug 25 2004
DDR2 always seemed like a hype to me and I felt Intel more or less introduced it in order to keep their platforms scoring high on sandra bandwidths
since 939's introduction, sandra mem bandwidth figures have soared on DDR1 and there was no way intel's traditional northbridge memory controller and the prescott CPU was able to get anywhere near the A64 on-die dual channel controller.
so they push DDR2 which keeps the P4 platform on par. at least in synthetic benchmarks anyway
Last edited by lazyboy1984; 24-04-2005 at 05:08 PM.
|26-04-2005, 11:05 PM||#4|
Join Date: Aug 13 2004
if u look at more recent performance reviews... u will see that DDR2 intel systems outperform any DDR intel system. Where tight latencies were originally lacking, it has now been somewhat fixed with 3-2-2-8 parts and very high mhz modules to allow high bandwidth. STILL... AMD is da bomb... a64 in da house!
|cooltechzonecom, ddr2, design, intel, knew, news, poor|
|Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)|
|Similar Threads for: [news] Intel knew DDR2 was poor design @ CoolTechZone.com|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Memtest86+ (v5.00 beta 4)||eva2000||General Software||61||30-03-2013 06:07 PM|
|eva2000's search for DDR2 Intel Core 2 Duo Conroe memory||eva2000||DDR2 Intel Memory||127||17-03-2010 12:46 PM|
|Memset v4.1 Beta 4 / CPU Tweaker v1.5 (P55/X58) - tweaking Intel chipset memory timings||eva2000||General Software||19||22-09-2009 02:22 AM|
|Intel Core i7 920, 940, 965EE Nehalem online reviews list||eva2000||General Intel Motherboards / CPU||7||18-12-2008 06:04 PM|
|DDR2 Full Specs List||GoriLLakoS||DDR2 Intel Memory||48||02-08-2008 02:51 AM|
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:51 PM.