You are not registered yet. Please click here to register!
Core 2 Duo @ <3600mhz, 32M benchmarks - Page 51 - i4memory.com - different look at memory
Tags Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 31-05-2007, 09:14 PM   #401
sTARk
Senior Member
sTARk's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Nov 06 2006
Location: Wollongong, Oz!
Posts: 928
Re: Core 2 Duo @ <3600mhz, 32M benchmarks

Are you kidding me? You have done 10 secs on the initial with a total in the low 13's. I'm still high 13's and i dont see where i can pull any extra from
sTARk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2007, 09:54 PM   #402
eva2000
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 23,021
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 42
Re: Core 2 Duo @ <3600mhz, 32M benchmarks

i must be doing it wrongly.. non-copy waza times are faster for me
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2007, 10:00 PM   #403
sTARk
Senior Member
sTARk's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Nov 06 2006
Location: Wollongong, Oz!
Posts: 928
Re: Core 2 Duo @ <3600mhz, 32M benchmarks

Yeh i'm trying non-copy now on my SATA2 drive rather then my Raptor and already I gained 10s on my best time....
sTARk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2007, 10:46 PM   #404
dinos22
Senior Member
dinos22's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Mar 26 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 9,825
Re: Core 2 Duo @ <3600mhz, 32M benchmarks

By sTARk View Post
Are you kidding me? You have done 10 secs on the initial with a total in the low 13's. I'm still high 13's and i dont see where i can pull any extra from
SPi requires lots of ****ing around until you get it sweet

i've been too busy to try a whole lot of tweaks since my 13m 03s run because i know i can tweak it sub 13m but just haven't had the time
dinos22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 09:37 PM   #405
sTARk
Senior Member
sTARk's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Nov 06 2006
Location: Wollongong, Oz!
Posts: 928
Re: Core 2 Duo @ <3600mhz, 32M benchmarks

sTARk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 09:49 PM   #406
Dice
Senior Member
Dice's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Nov 02 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 153
Re: Core 2 Duo @ <3600mhz, 32M benchmarks

Yeah 5-5-4 should be much easier on this RAM. I like to start then stop super PI after the initial run a few times, usually fluctuates a bit for me.
Dice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 10:29 PM   #407
dinos22
Senior Member
dinos22's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Mar 26 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 9,825
Re: Core 2 Duo @ <3600mhz, 32M benchmarks

much nicer mate

so what were the changes in that run
dinos22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 10:43 PM   #408
sTARk
Senior Member
sTARk's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Nov 06 2006
Location: Wollongong, Oz!
Posts: 928
Re: Core 2 Duo @ <3600mhz, 32M benchmarks

By dinos22 View Post
so what were the changes in that run
major change was spi folder copied from raptor to sata 2 seagte drive. I usually ran 16k a few times then started 32M and restarted if i got a **** initial value

Edit: why does my avatar keep getting deleted or overidden
sTARk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
<3600mhz, 32m, benchmarks, core, duo


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Core 2 Duo @ <3600mhz, 32M benchmarks
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[hwbot] Super Pi v1.50 - 1M rankings pt2 hwbot HWBOT Official Rankings 25 22-12-2009 08:11 AM
[hwbot] wPrime 32M Rankings pt2 hwbot HWBOT Official Rankings 32 06-06-2009 10:01 PM
[hwbot] wPrime 1024M rankings pt2 hwbot HWBOT Official Rankings 16 06-06-2009 10:00 PM
[hwbot] wPrime 32M Rankings hwbot HWBOT Official Rankings 161 14-04-2008 02:17 PM
[hwbot] Super Pi v1.50 32M rankings - i4memory.com hwbot HWBOT Official Rankings 437 14-04-2008 01:34 PM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 08:07 AM.

no new posts