You are not registered yet. Please click here to register!
[benchmark] 3dmark06 @1600x1200 ONLY results - i4memory.com - different look at memory

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 20-01-2006, 12:50 AM   #1
eva2000
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 23,046
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 42
Talking [benchmark] 3dmark06 @1600x1200 ONLY results

Would be interesting to see how the top end cards do if they make one change in 3dmark06 to run it @1600x1200 instead

Post your results here
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2006, 01:38 AM   #2
eva2000
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 23,046
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 42
512MB HIS X1800XT @756/900
1600x1200
3dmark06 = 4,253
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=18818
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-07-2006, 05:45 PM   #3
RodneyJM
Senior Member
RodneyJM's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jun 01 2005
Location: Forever in Silicon Wars !
Posts: 1,849
Re: [benchmark] 3dmark06 @1600x1200 ONLY results

Ok, finally got around to doing this one.
2 screenies, 1 @ 3D default, 2nd @ max stable vga overclock on air - both with cat 6.6 drivers.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=405274


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=405365
RodneyJM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-07-2006, 08:52 PM   #4
alpha0ne
Senior Member
alpha0ne's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Feb 25 2005
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 5,287
Re: [benchmark] 3dmark06 @1600x1200 ONLY results

A lot better for cards using 512MB ram but for cards with only 256MB it really puts them at a disadvantage
alpha0ne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-07-2006, 10:08 PM   #5
RodneyJM
Senior Member
RodneyJM's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jun 01 2005
Location: Forever in Silicon Wars !
Posts: 1,849
Re: [benchmark] 3dmark06 @1600x1200 ONLY results

By alpha0ne
A lot better for cards using 512MB ram but for cards with only 256MB it really puts them at a disadvantage
True, now all I need is Kentsfield... and appropriate motherboard...
RodneyJM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 11:47 PM   #6
RodneyJM
Senior Member
RodneyJM's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jun 01 2005
Location: Forever in Silicon Wars !
Posts: 1,849
Re: [benchmark] 3dmark06 @1600x1200 ONLY results

Time to update this thread...
Did this with stock 3D volts.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=479361

RodneyJM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 01:25 AM   #7
alpha0ne
Senior Member
alpha0ne's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Feb 25 2005
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 5,287
Re: [benchmark] 3dmark06 @1600x1200 ONLY results

When I finish putting my rig back together I'll do a run @ 3.90GHz with my 1900XT @ default as I have'nt done any OC's as yet
alpha0ne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2006, 02:43 AM   #8
RodneyJM
Senior Member
RodneyJM's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jun 01 2005
Location: Forever in Silicon Wars !
Posts: 1,849
Re: [benchmark] 3dmark06 @1600x1200 ONLY results

With Cat. 6.9 & slightly higher 3D clocks than before.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=508667



RodneyJM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
3dmark06, benchmark, results


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: [benchmark] 3dmark06 @1600x1200 ONLY results
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[benchmark] 3DMark Vantage - post your results eva2000 Graphics Benchmarks 28 30-04-2013 12:06 PM
[benchmark] 3dmark06 scores post them here eva2000 Graphics Benchmarks 238 22-01-2011 01:51 AM
ATi Cat 8.4 on the ATi download site. necron66 Video Cards 1 17-04-2008 09:59 PM
Interesting 3DMark06 results... Jammer Graphics Benchmarks 7 31-07-2006 08:38 PM
[benchmark] FEAR results eva2000 Graphics Benchmarks 16 02-05-2006 11:38 PM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:22 PM.