You are not registered yet. Please click here to register!
OCZ Core SSD 2.5" solid state disk Raid - Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E x8 Raid controller - i4memory.com - different look at memory
Tags Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


OCZ Core SSD 2.5" solid state disk Raid - Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E x8 Raid controller

This is a discussion on OCZ Core SSD 2.5" solid state disk Raid - Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E x8 Raid controller within the Flash Memory & SSD devices forums, part of the Flash Memory category; Time for a OCZ Core series SSD follow up but this time I'll pair 4x 32GB OCZ Core series SSD ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 20-10-2008, 03:36 PM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,181
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 37
OCZ Core SSD 2.5" solid state disk Raid - Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E x8 Raid controller

Time for a OCZ Core series SSD follow up but this time I'll pair 4x 32GB OCZ Core series SSD 2.5" solid state disks with a hardware raid controller, Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E raid controller which has a 256MB DDR2 on board cache. I've placed the OCZ Core SSDs in Manhattan dual drive L-Type hot swappable mobile racks which allow 2x 2.5" SATA disks to occupy a single 3.5" bay.







OCZ Core series SSD specifications:
  • Available in 32(30)GB, 64(60)GB, 128(120)GB capacities
  • Read: up to 143 MB/sec
  • Write: up to 93 MB/sec
  • Seek: <.35ms Slim 2.5" Design
  • 100.2 x 70 x 9.3mm
  • Lightweight 77g
  • Operating Temp: -10C ~ +70C
  • Storage Temp: -55C ~ +140C
  • Low Power Consumption
  • Shock Resistant 1500G
  • RAID Support
  • MTBF 1.5 million hours
  • 2 year warranty

Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF specifications:
  • Intel IOP 81341 (800MHz)
  • PCI -Express x8 (x16 slot compatible)
  • 256 MB of DDR II memory with ECC protection
  • RAID 6 performance with sustained transfer rates over 780MB/s Read and over 685MB/s Write
  • 8 SATA II Channels at 3Gb/s per port
  • 2 x internal mini-SAS connectors each supporting 4x SATAII drives
  • RAID 0/1/5/6/10/50 JBOD support
  • Multi -adapter support up to 4 adapters
  • BIOS booting support
  • BIOS PnP and BBS (BIOS boot specification)support
  • Intel RAID 6 Engine for large capacity RAID arrays
  • Option Battery Backup Unit (BBU-03)
  • Multiple Logical Drive Support
  • Online array roaming
  • Online capacity expansion (OCE) and Online RAID level migration (ORLM)
  • Quick and Background initialization for instant RAID configuration
  • Automatic drive insertion / removal detection and rebuild
  • 64bit LBA support greater than 2TB per volume
  • S.M.A.R.T monitoring hard drive status for reliability
  • Staggered Spinup with user selection in BIOS
  • (MAID) spin down drives in array is idle
  • (VSS) Variable Sector Size for over 2TB support in 32bit LBA OS
  • Active/Failed LED
  • Command Line Interface (CLI)
  • Web browser-base RAID management software
  • Disk scrubbing to prevent degraded RAID arrays
  • Bad sector repair and remapping to reduce dropped drives
  • ATA pass-through mode support
  • Microsoft Windows 2003/XP/2000, Redhat Enterprise Linux /CentOS , Fedora Core, SuSE Linux, FreeBSD, Linux kernel 2.6
  • Dimensions: 6.45" x 2.59"

Manhattan Dual Drive 2.5" mobile rack specifications:
  • Directly insert SATA 150/300 drives into a desktop PC bay — no internal tray required
  • Space-saving design fits two 2.5” drives in a single 3.5” bay
  • Hot-swappable — ideal for transporting data between multiple locations and PCs
  • Unique case maximizes airflow and cooling efficiency
  • Lifetime Warranty
  • Supports data transfer speeds up to 3 Gbps
  • LED power and activity indicators
  • 134 x 102 x 24 mm (5.27 x 4 x 0.9 in.); 282.5 g (9.9 oz.)
  • System requirements:
  • (2) internal SATA data connections and (2) Molex 4-pin connections
  • Windows 2000/XP/Vista or MAC OS version 9.3 or above

Last edited by eva2000; 20-10-2008 at 08:45 PM.
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-10-2008, 04:17 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,181
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 37
Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF
Bios setup screenshots


Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF supports creation of raid 0, 1, 1/0, 3, 5, 5/0, 6 and JBOD volumes with Block size options of 16K, 32K, 64K, 128K, 256K, 512K and 1024K.

The default controller settings are listed on left and the settings used for the 4x32GB OCZ Core SSD raid tests are listed on right.


Before plugging in the OCZ core SSDs, I flashed the 3520LF controller to latest bios and firmware versions, 1.40.0416 and 1.3.28.16 respectively.


Last edited by eva2000; 20-10-2008 at 08:34 PM.
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-10-2008, 08:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,181
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 37
4x 32GB OCZ Core SSD 2.5" Raid 0
16K vs 64K vs 128K vs 128K NTFS 16K cluster vs 256K Block Size comparison
Vista Ultimate SP1 64bit


I decided to compare the raid 0 performance when different 3520LF controller block sizes were used in the creation of raid 0 arrays. The following block sizes were tested:
  • 16K Block size with default NTFS 4K cluster
  • 64K Block size with default NTFS 4K cluster
  • 128K Block size with default NTFS 4K cluster
  • 128K Block size with default NTFS 16K cluster
  • 256K Block size with default NTFS 4K cluster
Enhanced Performance was enabled on all tests.



System specifications:
Benchmark Applications Used:
ATTO Bench 256MB

256K Block size saw ATTO pull out well over 500+ MB/s read and 300+ MB/s write. 128K block size with 16K NTFS cluster seem to have boosted the ATTO write bandwidth slightly though.

16K Block size vs 64K Block size


128K Block size vs 256K Block size


128K Block size with NTFS 16K cluster

Last edited by eva2000; 21-10-2008 at 11:35 PM.
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-10-2008, 08:36 PM   #4 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,181
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 37
HDTach 32MB

Again 256K Block size led the way with 482.8MB/s average read speed and 1002MB/s burst speeds



16K Block size vs 64K Block size


128K Block size vs 256K Block size


128K Block size with NTFS 16K cluster

Last edited by eva2000; 21-10-2008 at 11:28 PM.
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-10-2008, 08:36 PM   #5 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,181
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 37
HDTune 2.55




16K Block size vs 64K Block size


128K Block size vs 256K Block size


128K Block size with NTFS 16K cluster

Last edited by eva2000; 21-10-2008 at 11:28 PM.
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-10-2008, 08:36 PM   #6 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,181
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 37
Everest Ultimate 4.60.1536 Beta
Read suite & Random Write

128K block size with 16K NTFS cluster had the highest average random write performance at 194.5MB/s followed by 256K block size with default 4K NTFS cluster size of 191.8MB/s.



128K block size with 16K NTFS cluster size


Last edited by eva2000; 21-10-2008 at 11:28 PM.
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-10-2008, 08:36 PM   #7 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,181
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 37
Iometer 64bit 2008.6.18
4K Random Write 100%

Using Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E raid controller with 256MB DDR2 cache definitely boosted the OCZ Core SSD's performance in this test. Compared with onboard Gigabyte EP45 Extreme's ICH10R controller with single 32GB OCZ Core SSD result and 2x 32GB OCZ Core SSD raid 0 result, there was respectively a 66x and 33x times improvement with Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF!



Configuration used: 10GB iometer test file



16K Block size vs 64K Block size


128K Block size vs 256K Block size


128K Block size with NTFS 16K cluster

Last edited by eva2000; 21-10-2008 at 11:46 PM.
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-10-2008, 08:36 PM   #8 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,181
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 37
Pcmark05 Suite & HDD Test

Both 128K block 4K and 16K NTFS cluster resulted in highest performance followed closely by 256K block size.



128K block with 16K NTFS cluster



Last edited by eva2000; 21-10-2008 at 11:29 PM.
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
3520lf, highpoint, ocz core ssd, pci-e raid controller, raid 0, solid state disks, ssd raid


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: OCZ Core SSD 2.5" solid state disk Raid - Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E x8 Raid controller
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A better "Handle" :-D mag3 Asus Intel motherboards / CPU 6 05-02-2010 04:17 AM
[hwbot] Super Pi v1.50 - 1M rankings pt2 hwbot HWBOT Official Rankings 25 22-12-2009 07:11 AM
[hwbot] Pcmark05 rankings pt2 hwbot HWBOT Official Rankings 101 19-06-2009 05:33 AM
[hwbot] wPrime 32M Rankings pt2 hwbot HWBOT Official Rankings 32 06-06-2009 09:01 PM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:46 PM.

no new posts