| Notices |
Welcome to the i4memory.com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), create your own blog, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
OCZ Core SSD 2.5" solid state disk Raid - Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E x8 Raid controller
 |
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 17,184
|
|
|
OCZ Core SSD 2.5" solid state disk Raid - Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E x8 Raid controller
|
20-10-2008, 04:36 PM
#1 (permalink)
|
Time for a OCZ Core series SSD follow up but this time I'll pair 4x 32GB OCZ Core series SSD 2.5" solid state disks with a hardware raid controller, Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E raid controller which has a 256MB DDR2 on board cache. I've placed the OCZ Core SSDs in Manhattan dual drive L-Type hot swappable mobile racks which allow 2x 2.5" SATA disks to occupy a single 3.5" bay.
OCZ Core series SSD specifications:- Available in 32(30)GB, 64(60)GB, 128(120)GB capacities
- Read: up to 143 MB/sec
- Write: up to 93 MB/sec
- Seek: <.35ms Slim 2.5" Design
- 100.2 x 70 x 9.3mm
- Lightweight 77g
- Operating Temp: -10C ~ +70C
- Storage Temp: -55C ~ +140C
- Low Power Consumption
- Shock Resistant 1500G
- RAID Support
- MTBF 1.5 million hours
- 2 year warranty
Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF specifications:- Intel IOP 81341 (800MHz)
- PCI -Express x8 (x16 slot compatible)
- 256 MB of DDR II memory with ECC protection
- RAID 6 performance with sustained transfer rates over 780MB/s Read and over 685MB/s Write
- 8 SATA II Channels at 3Gb/s per port
- 2 x internal mini-SAS connectors each supporting 4x SATAII drives
- RAID 0/1/5/6/10/50 JBOD support
- Multi -adapter support up to 4 adapters
- BIOS booting support
- BIOS PnP and BBS (BIOS boot specification)support
- Intel RAID 6 Engine for large capacity RAID arrays
- Option Battery Backup Unit (BBU-03)
- Multiple Logical Drive Support
- Online array roaming
- Online capacity expansion (OCE) and Online RAID level migration (ORLM)
- Quick and Background initialization for instant RAID configuration
- Automatic drive insertion / removal detection and rebuild
- 64bit LBA support greater than 2TB per volume
- S.M.A.R.T monitoring hard drive status for reliability
- Staggered Spinup with user selection in BIOS
- (MAID) spin down drives in array is idle
- (VSS) Variable Sector Size for over 2TB support in 32bit LBA OS
- Active/Failed LED
- Command Line Interface (CLI)
- Web browser-base RAID management software
- Disk scrubbing to prevent degraded RAID arrays
- Bad sector repair and remapping to reduce dropped drives
- ATA pass-through mode support
- Microsoft Windows 2003/XP/2000, Redhat Enterprise Linux /CentOS , Fedora Core, SuSE Linux, FreeBSD, Linux kernel 2.6
- Dimensions: 6.45" x 2.59"
Manhattan Dual Drive 2.5" mobile rack specifications:- Directly insert SATA 150/300 drives into a desktop PC bay — no internal tray required
- Space-saving design fits two 2.5” drives in a single 3.5” bay
- Hot-swappable — ideal for transporting data between multiple locations and PCs
- Unique case maximizes airflow and cooling efficiency
- Lifetime Warranty
- Supports data transfer speeds up to 3 Gbps
- LED power and activity indicators
- 134 x 102 x 24 mm (5.27 x 4 x 0.9 in.); 282.5 g (9.9 oz.)
- System requirements:
- (2) internal SATA data connections and (2) Molex 4-pin connections
- Windows 2000/XP/Vista or MAC OS version 9.3 or above
|
|
Last edited by eva2000; 20-10-2008 at 09:45 PM..
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 17,184
|
|
|
|
20-10-2008, 05:17 PM
#2 (permalink)
|
Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF
Bios setup screenshots
Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF supports creation of raid 0, 1, 1/0, 3, 5, 5/0, 6 and JBOD volumes with Block size options of 16K, 32K, 64K, 128K, 256K, 512K and 1024K.
The default controller settings are listed on left and the settings used for the 4x32GB OCZ Core SSD raid tests are listed on right.
Before plugging in the OCZ core SSDs, I flashed the 3520LF controller to latest bios and firmware versions, 1.40.0416 and 1.3.28.16 respectively.
|
|
Last edited by eva2000; 20-10-2008 at 09:34 PM..
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 17,184
|
|
|
|
20-10-2008, 09:33 PM
#3 (permalink)
|
4x 32GB OCZ Core SSD 2.5" Raid 0
16K vs 64K vs 128K vs 128K NTFS 16K cluster vs 256K Block Size comparison
Vista Ultimate SP1 64bit
I decided to compare the raid 0 performance when different 3520LF controller block sizes were used in the creation of raid 0 arrays. The following block sizes were tested:
- 16K Block size with default NTFS 4K cluster
- 64K Block size with default NTFS 4K cluster
- 128K Block size with default NTFS 4K cluster
- 128K Block size with default NTFS 16K cluster
- 256K Block size with default NTFS 4K cluster
Enhanced Performance was enabled on all tests.
System specifications:
Benchmark Applications Used:
ATTO Bench 256MB
256K Block size saw ATTO pull out well over 500+ MB/s read and 300+ MB/s write. 128K block size with 16K NTFS cluster seem to have boosted the ATTO write bandwidth slightly though.
16K Block size vs 64K Block size
128K Block size vs 256K Block size
128K Block size with NTFS 16K cluster

|
|
Last edited by eva2000; 22-10-2008 at 12:35 AM..
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 17,184
|
|
|
|
20-10-2008, 09:36 PM
#4 (permalink)
|
HDTach 32MB
Again 256K Block size led the way with 482.8MB/s average read speed and 1002MB/s burst speeds
16K Block size vs 64K Block size
128K Block size vs 256K Block size
128K Block size with NTFS 16K cluster

|
|
Last edited by eva2000; 22-10-2008 at 12:28 AM..
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 17,184
|
|
|
|
20-10-2008, 09:36 PM
#5 (permalink)
|
HDTune 2.55
16K Block size vs 64K Block size
128K Block size vs 256K Block size
128K Block size with NTFS 16K cluster

|
|
Last edited by eva2000; 22-10-2008 at 12:28 AM..
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 17,184
|
|
|
|
20-10-2008, 09:36 PM
#6 (permalink)
|
Everest Ultimate 4.60.1536 Beta
Read suite & Random Write
128K block size with 16K NTFS cluster had the highest average random write performance at 194.5MB/s followed by 256K block size with default 4K NTFS cluster size of 191.8MB/s.
128K block size with 16K NTFS cluster size

|
|
Last edited by eva2000; 22-10-2008 at 12:28 AM..
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 17,184
|
|
|
|
20-10-2008, 09:36 PM
#7 (permalink)
|
Iometer 64bit 2008.6.18
4K Random Write 100%
Using Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF PCI-E raid controller with 256MB DDR2 cache definitely boosted the OCZ Core SSD's performance in this test. Compared with onboard Gigabyte EP45 Extreme's ICH10R controller with single 32GB OCZ Core SSD result and 2x 32GB OCZ Core SSD raid 0 result, there was respectively a 66x and 33x times improvement with Highpoint RocketRaid 3520LF!
Configuration used: 10GB iometer test file
16K Block size vs 64K Block size
128K Block size vs 256K Block size
128K Block size with NTFS 16K cluster

|
|
Last edited by eva2000; 22-10-2008 at 12:46 AM..
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 17,184
|
|
|
|
20-10-2008, 09:36 PM
#8 (permalink)
|
Pcmark05 Suite & HDD Test
Both 128K block 4K and 16K NTFS cluster resulted in highest performance followed closely by 256K block size.
128K block with 16K NTFS cluster

|
|
Last edited by eva2000; 22-10-2008 at 12:29 AM..
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 9 (0 members and 9 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
| |
|
|
|