You are not registered yet. Please click here to register!
Western Digital WD6400AAKS vs Samsung HD642JJ - i4memory.com - different look at memory
i4memory.com - different look at memory
Home > Hardware > Hard drives & Controllers > Western Digital WD6400AAKS vs Samsung HD642JJ
Tags Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Western Digital WD6400AAKS vs Samsung HD642JJ

This is a discussion on Western Digital WD6400AAKS vs Samsung HD642JJ within the Hard drives & Controllers forums, part of the Hardware category; Interesting initial results for 640GB SATA disks from Western Digital and Samsung http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=180779 vs...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-04-2008, 07:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,924
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 42
Talking Western Digital WD6400AAKS vs Samsung HD642JJ
Interesting initial results for 640GB SATA disks from Western Digital and Samsung http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=180779





vs
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-07-2008, 08:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
GMX
Senior Member
GMX's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Aug 14 2005
Posts: 166
Re: Western Digital WD6400AAKS vs Samsung HD642JJ
I don't get it? Why are these drives still on 16mb cache.

I only see 32mb ones in (older series) Seagates and also in 500/750gb Samsung F1s which are NOT the 334gb platter such as the 320/640/1000.

Will it come or not?
GMX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-07-2008, 10:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,924
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 42
Re: Western Digital WD6400AAKS vs Samsung HD642JJ
keeping costs down and/or extending product lifecycles ?
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-07-2008, 09:34 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
Jammer's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Mar 22 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,009
Re: Western Digital WD6400AAKS vs Samsung HD642JJ
eva the WD results arent showing up for me. Says pic is down?
Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-07-2008, 02:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,924
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 42
Re: Western Digital WD6400AAKS vs Samsung HD642JJ
Yeah not sure why but here's another one for WD
eva2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
hd642jj, hdtach, hdtune, raid, samsung, wd6400aaks, western digital

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Western Digital WD6400AAKS vs Samsung HD642JJ
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[TechArp.com] Western Digital RE4-GP 2 TB Hard Disk Drive Review News Reviews & News Online 0 06-03-2010 06:30 AM
[TechArp.com] Western Digital 320 GB Scorpio Black Notebook Hard Disk Drive Review News Reviews & News Online 0 27-10-2009 02:12 PM
[TechArp.com] Western Digital 300 GB VelociRaptor Serial ATA Hard Drive Review News Reviews & News Online 0 11-10-2008 05:30 PM
[TechArp.com] Western Digital 1 TB Caviar GP Serial ATA Hard Drive Review eva2000 Reviews & News Online 0 15-05-2008 02:51 AM
Western Digital Raptor 36gb Afrokiller General Hardware 5 09-11-2005 04:18 PM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:09 AM.

no new posts