i4memory.com Follow i4memory.com on Twitter
Go Back   i4memory.com > Hardware > Motherboards / CPU > Intel motherboards / CPU > Asus Intel motherboards / CPU
Home Register Ramlist All AlbumsBlogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Discuss Asus P6T6 WS Revolution Info, Overclocking Guide & Photos in Asus Intel motherboards / CPU at i4memory.com
Interesting the differences B2B settings have on SPI32M time vs everest. From everest results alone you'd think the difference would ...

Post New Thread  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 07 2008
Australia
Posts: 483
CryptiK is offline
Old 23-07-2009, 01:33 AM   #33 (permalink)

Interesting the differences B2B settings have on SPI32M time vs everest. From everest results alone you'd think the difference would be larger. An almost 18% and 10% difference in read and copy is huge. Latency is practically identical regardless of B2B setting though, this may have a large influence. Perhaps the bandwidth with triple channel is redundant over a certain point bringing very minimal gains alone.
Reply With Quote
Administrator
 eva2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 20,985
Blog Entries: 30
eva2000 is offline
Old 24-07-2009, 11:11 PM   #34 (permalink)

Yeah B2B is interesting - looking forward to combining B2B and high uncore later on.

I'm testing a private beta bios right now unfortunately not allowed to share yet. Just messing around with uncore frequency with default auto B2B




Last edited by eva2000; 24-07-2009 at 11:43 PM..
Reply With Quote
Senior Member
 Benji Tshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 22 2008
France
France
Posts: 273
Benji Tshi is offline
Old 25-07-2009, 03:59 AM   #35 (permalink)

George, what do you think about the efficiency of the board, compare to the T3eH8 ? And what's about the memory/uncore clocks you are able to reach.
I have both at home, and also classified, but really no time to test
__________________
French touch :p
Reply With Quote
Administrator
 eva2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 20,985
Blog Entries: 30
eva2000 is offline
Old 25-07-2009, 10:13 AM   #36 (permalink)

Out of the box seems P6T6 WS Revo on default AUTO values is faster even for CAS9. But it means everything is set very aggressively/tight on P6T6 compared to DFI UT X58. That could be good and bad depending on whether P6T6 limits your overclocking because things are too tight. Still too early to tell but investigating

Uncore Frequency Testing - preliminary findings


As to uncore testing, i only really did max uncore extensive test with W3520 D0 on DFI UT X58 around Uncore of 4600-4760mhz for 32M pi-validations. All only i7 920 C0/D0 cpus on DFI UT X58-T3EH8, I didn't push uncore past 4200-4400mhz. On P6T6, only used my poorest/worst i7 920 3836A756 C0 #2 cpu and that easily pushed to 4200mhz uncore for 32M and 4401mhz uncore for validation. This is all on water cooled cpu. So pretty nice the differences could be due to C0 vs D0 stepping or added NF200 on P6T6 ?.

P6T6 though gains performance in 32M pi up to 4200mhz. At 4300+ uncore 32M pi loops were slower than at 4200 and below uncore, so suggests RTL latency etc was too loose at 4300+ uncore. Still more investigating need

So for you viewing pleasure

System:
Super Pi 32M
Uncore Comparisons: 16x vs 18x vs 19x vs 20x vs 21x

Testing uncore frequency on i7 920 3836A756 C0 #2 cpu with P6T6 WS Revolution 0601 beta bios and pretty much the same key voltages needed for 32M Pi stability as with DFI UT X58-T3EH8 tests with W3520 D0 cpu - CPU VTT and VDIMM - as you push Uncore frequency higher you need more CPU VTT uncore volts (QPI/DRAM) and VDIMM



Max screenshot uncore for now is 4401Mhz















Everest Ultimate
Uncore and RTL A/B/C value comparisons


RTL A/B/C = 51/54/54


RTL A/B/C = 61/62/63


RTL A/B/C = 64/66/66


RTL A/B/C = 66/66/67


RTL A/B/C = 69/72/72
Reply With Quote
Administrator
 eva2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 20,985
Blog Entries: 30
eva2000 is offline
Old 27-07-2009, 01:24 AM   #37 (permalink)

i7 920 3836A756 C0 #2 @4493Mhz HT Enabled

Managed 25Mhz clocks higher HT enabled Super Pi 32M clock than what I could manage with exact same cooling on DFI UT X58-T3EH8.
  • Asus P6T6 WS Revolution HT Enabled 32M Pi @1.488v = 4493Mhz
  • DFI UT X58-T3EH8 HT Enabled 32M Pi @1.488v = 4468Mhz

Click image for full screen shot

@4493Mhz


@4468Mhz


Some 3d benchmarking





System:
Reply With Quote
Administrator
 eva2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 20,985
Blog Entries: 30
eva2000 is offline
Old 27-07-2009, 11:43 PM   #38 (permalink)

Max BCLK Testing continued...

7 days ago, tried my first attempt at max bclk on i7 920 3836A756 C0 #2 cpu, and got to around 228bclk validation but no 32M Pi stability. Now after trial and error testing of bios settings and voltages, managed to pull off 230 bclk validation and 225.8 bclk for Super Pi 32M.

Asus TurboV windows app was pretty useful for testing different voltages within windows for Super Pi 32M. I used TurboV in conjunction with setFSB to start with 220 bclk boot from bios into windows and setFSB to 223 bclk for 32M Pi. Then after figuring out voltages tried 225 bclk boot from bios into windows and passed 32M Pi at 225 and 226 bclk.

230 bclk






220 bclk boot from bios, 32M Pi passed @220bclk, setFSB to 221bclk, 222bclk, and 223bclk.

click image for full screenshot.

220bclk



221bclk



222bclk



223bclk



225bclk boot from bios, 32M Pi passed @225bclk and setFSB to 226bclk.

225bclk



226bclk



PCI-E Frequency = 110mhz for all above tests.

System:
More tests to come
Reply With Quote
Member
 kangaxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 16 2009
Posts: 66
kangaxx is offline
Old 04-08-2009, 04:45 AM   #39 (permalink)

how to disable current and voltage limit for the cpu ??
which is the item ?
Reply With Quote
Administrator
 eva2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 20,985
Blog Entries: 30
eva2000 is offline
Old 04-08-2009, 03:12 PM   #40 (permalink)

Originally Posted by kangaxx View Post
how to disable current and voltage limit for the cpu ??
which is the item ?
Don't think current bioses allow for this, closest would be CPU TM Function: Disabled for thermal management but not TDP/TCP. But apparently next Asus bios will have this option
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
asus p6t6 ws revolution, x58


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads for: Asus P6T6 WS Revolution Info, Overclocking Guide & Photos
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core i7 920 Overclocking Guide (Asus P6T Deluxe) @Bit-tech.net eva2000 Asus Intel motherboards / CPU 15 30-01-2009 11:07 AM
Asus Rampage II Extreme, P6T WS Pro, P6T Deluxe/Deluxe OC Palm, P6T6 WS Revolution eva2000 Asus Intel motherboards / CPU 20 14-01-2009 03:47 AM
AMD64 Overclocking Guide (07/11/06) eva2000 General AMD Motherboards / CPU 7 02-11-2006 04:42 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT +11. The time now is 07:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2