**i4memory SuperPI Mod v1.4 Rankings**
This is a discussion on **i4memory SuperPI Mod v1.4 Rankings** within the General Benchmarks forums, part of the Benchmarking category; ok. im gonna try entering my times for a second time. 1mill 26.406s ncc-1709 [ Screenshot 3194MHz Opteron 165 CBBWE ...
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #977 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 21 2006
Posts: 16
| Re: **i4memory SuperPI Mod v1.4 Rankings**
ok. im gonna try entering my times for a second time. 1mill 26.406s ncc-1709 [Screenshot 3194MHz Opteron 165 CBBWE 0602 chiller- 2x512 corsair XMS XL pro tccd @ 3.3v] 32mill 23m 13.438s ncc-1709 [Screenshot 3184MHz Opteron 165 CBBWE 0602 chiller- 2x512 corsair XMS XL pro tccd @ 3.3v] |
| |
| | #978 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 25 2005 Location: Mandurah
Posts: 5,287
| Re: **i4memory SuperPI Mod v1.4 Rankings** By ncc-1709
Why dont you try reading the first post that details what is required to have your entry accepted |
| |
| | #981 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 10 2005 Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 2,099
| Re: **i4memory SuperPI Mod v1.4 Rankings** By alpha0ne Sure is, but TCCD running at 3.24v? Is that safe or even possible?
Hey, ncc-1709. Why don't you post a copy for the hwbot 32M i4memory team [hwbot] ncc-1709 - 23m 13s 438ms - Opteron 165 CBBWE 0602 @3184Mhz - 2x512 corsair XMS XL pro tccd @ 3.3v [/hwbot] |
| Last edited by SLi_dog; 24-07-2006 at 10:16 PM. | |
| |
| | #982 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 25 2005 Location: Mandurah
Posts: 5,287
| Re: **i4memory SuperPI Mod v1.4 Rankings** By SLi_dog Only just noticed TCCD being used
, thats a good way to kill it, it would probably clock better with ~ 3V max Vdimm unless you have already damaged themI hope you had a good fan cooling them down, I reckon they would have been too hot to touch |
| |
| | #983 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 21 2006
Posts: 16
| Re: **i4memory SuperPI Mod v1.4 Rankings**
there tccd, but a nice special hand picked set from corsair direct. and if you check the bot, my times are allready with a team. the ram has seen 3.8v. but wont boot above 3.57v. and even then, it kicks out too much heat to be worth the voltage. and its been run that this voltage for nearly a year now. it does 272 @ 1.5-3-3-0, 278 @ 2-3-3-5 and 285 @ 2-4-4-8 and i have been using dfi boards so you need the fans for the PWM, so the ram is cooled. ive also tried a peltier on them, quite fun designing a brace to slot over both sticks of ram. managed to get them down to 3*c, but dident boot them that cold. too much condensation for my likings. and BTW, im a hwbot mod, you have too many hyphens in those tags, only one is needed between the score and the HW now, no usernames needed. |
| Last edited by ncc-1709; 25-07-2006 at 10:38 AM. | |
| |
| | #984 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 26 2005 Location: Sydney
Posts: 9,760
| Re: **i4memory SuperPI Mod v1.4 Rankings**
3.8v that must be some sort of world record not very good clocking ram either i might add you have another 100Mhz to shave off to be at 23m15s but i don't know whether dual core CPUs might suffer some performance loss at single 32M benchmarks compared to single cores......nice clocking CPU |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| i4memory, mod, rankings, superpi, v14 |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: **i4memory SuperPI Mod v1.4 Rankings**
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [hwbot] Super Pi v1.50 - 1M rankings pt2 | hwbot | HWBOT Official Rankings | 25 | 22-12-2009 07:11 AM |
| [hwbot] Super Pi v1.50 - 1M rankings | hwbot | HWBOT Official Rankings | 301 | 14-04-2008 01:18 PM |
| **i4memory SuperPI Mod v1.4 Rankings** [off topic banter] | sandwichamwin | General Hardware | 10 | 20-06-2005 01:08 AM |
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 03:06 AM.


, thats a good way to kill it, it would probably clock better with ~ 3V max Vdimm unless you have already damaged them











