Prime95 Questions and discussion
This is a discussion on Prime95 Questions and discussion within the General AMD DDR1 Memory forums, part of the DDR1 AMD Memory category; Alright, I normally stand by the accuracy of the results of a system being 'prime stable'. But since I've moved ...
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 23 2004 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 254
| Prime95 Questions and discussion
Alright, I normally stand by the accuracy of the results of a system being 'prime stable'. But since I've moved from AXP to A64 this has been slowly diminishing. I keep getting errors after 15mins+ with my setup no matter what voltage, no matter what FSB or memory timings. This all starts happening at 240HT (239 is prime stable... but 240HT isn't... even with a low LDT). Is there something I'm missing here.... i've read through a few A64 overclocking guides but nothing is helping. Worst thing is, the system is stable in every other test I throw at it.... just not Prime.... which worries me as I'm finding it hard to completely trust the system. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Administrator |
yeah A64 is a pain in the ass to properly stress test and test for stability especially if the lower multipliers don't work in bios or aren't retained by clockgen on reboot.. tried stresscpu [Download] Stresscpu - AMD64 friendly ? also sometimes i fine changing AGP lock from 66 to 67 stabilises the cpu and sometimes it doesn't heh |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 23 2004 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 254
|
My system boots at 201mhz HT, 67 AGP for my locks to work.... so thats always the case. But yeah, I seem to have found one big stability issue. My TWINX Rev1.2 (CH-5 I believe) is now priming fine at 224mhz (better than the previous best of 217mhz prime stable EDIT: Forgot to mention, 224mhz was done with 2.74v.... previous best of 217mhz was done with 2.94v). All I did was accidentally up the Ras to Cas to 4 instead of 3. But yeah, i've been using stresscpu since I saw you post it somewhere (here or OCAU.. can't remember :P). The system responds alot better to stresscpu... Also, one thing I noticed... reading the Prime95 help file it states that it may not always be accurate with its errors. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 24 2004 Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 392
|
Yep, I have long discarded Prime95 as a system testing utility since I went to A64 due to errors at low FSB.. Come one, what a crock of crap :P Now I use Stresscpu exclusively along with memtest86 |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| discussion, prime95, questions |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Prime95 Questions and discussion
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Anandtech.com] Ask Your Sandy Bridge Questions Here | News | Reviews & News Online | 0 | 09-12-2010 03:00 PM |
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:20 AM.














