[info] AMD64 Memory Divider/Multipler Table

09-01-2005, 06:28 PM #1 (**permalink**)

Courtesy of Oskar Wu from DFI

06:47 PM

Also now available A64 Mem Divider Helper software http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=49898

**VCE English Tuition** · 10-01-2005, 10:40 AM #3 (**permalink**)

hmmm hey eva... are u sure this table is 100% correct?

as in... there's someone who is telling me that if i use a .5x multi, then i should subtract 20-25mhz from the calculated value (ie, the A64 mem divider software is wrong... i shoudl be subtracting a futher 20-25mhz off that?).

I'm pretty sure they are wrong - but i thought i'd just ask you for clarification.

10-01-2005, 04:08 PM #4 (**permalink**)

if you read the thread for A64 Mem Divider Helper, IIRC it says to ignore .5 and not use them as the above doesn't apply... remember the table above is specific to DFI NF3 250Gb that Oskar Wu created. But try it and see what you get.. and come back and tell us

**VCE English Tuition** · 11-01-2005, 08:01 AM #5 (**permalink**)

Originally Posted by eva2000

if you read the thread for A64 Mem Divider Helper, IIRC it says to ignore .5 and not use them as the above doesn't apply... remember the table above is specific to DFI NF3 250Gb that Oskar Wu created. But try it and see what you get.. and come back and tell us

well according to CPU-Z, and that calculator i get 245.9mhz when my computer is set to 8.5 x 318, with a 166 memory setting, timigns 2.5-3-3-10 1T.

sisoft sandra 2005 memory bandwidth benchmark gives me 7300mb/sec and this returns the same result for when I set my system to 9 x 300, 166 divider (which gives me 246mhz).

both results are higher than when I set to 10 x 250 1:1, but i'm assuming htat's because of the 200mhz higher cpu clock.

so it looks like CPU-Z, the above table, and the calculator are indeed telling the truth.

11-01-2005, 11:25 AM #6 (**permalink**)

Thanks for the confirmation