|15-05-2006, 07:12 PM||#22 (permalink)|
Join Date: Jun 19 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
By Luke212From memory, Kingston have always rated their HyperX BH/CH chips with a minimum of 2-2-2-6 for PC3200 (HyperX TCCD was 2-2-2-5 @ 400 though). For PC3500 with CH IC's they rate them at 2-3-3-7. It doesn't mean they wont run those timings, it just provides a slightly larger safety net for the manufacturer for guaranteed speeds/timings.
After all, OCZ did it with its VVX line where they were rated at 2.5-3-3-7 but some sets like mine, T_M's & Babyelfs etc could run happily 2-2-2-5 at up to 260mhz, some others maxed out at 235-240mhz @ 2-2-2-5. From OCZ's standpoint, they do not need to RMA the poor performing modules as they were not guarenteed for those speeds at those timings. A similar strategy is also used on Gold VX PC3200 vs PC4000 modules for nominal voltage @ standard rated speeds from factory, where the PC4000 is rated at 3.3v & PC3200 at 2.6v. Hope you get the drift of what I am trying to say.
I'd say speed binning the IC's arent done too strenuously on behalf of Kingston, so they are a bit conservative with their labelling of certain timings. Although I may be wrong on this.
|Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)|
|Similar Threads for: dodgy bh-5?|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|[TheInquirer.com Graphics] Nvidia Spent $43.6 Million on dodgy chips||News||Reviews & News Online||0||17-03-2009 01:40 AM|
|dodgy Raptor||HR3NDUS||Hard drives & Controllers||8||12-09-2007 08:32 AM|
|Intel "Bearlake" G35 Xpress chipset||RodneyJM||General Intel Motherboards / CPU||24||10-01-2007 02:22 PM|
|Abit Lost the Plot ??||alpha0ne||General Intel Motherboards / CPU||6||21-06-2006 10:35 PM|
|Trinitor arrived :dodgy:||leggit||General Hardware||0||24-11-2005 02:11 PM|
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 11:48 AM.